The Image Index is a system based on likes received on images, that incentivizes the most active and liked members of the community. Learn more.
The Contribution Index (beta) is system to reward informative, constructive, and valuable commentary on AstroBin. Learn more.
Imaging telescopes or lenses: Skywatcher 300/1500
Imaging cameras: QHYCCD 183C
Mounts: Skywatcher EQ8 pro
Guiding telescopes or lenses: TS-Optics OAG
Guiding cameras: ZWO ASI120MM
Focal reducers: Baader MPCC Mark III Coma Corrector
Software: Gimp 2.10 · PixInsight 1.8 Ripley
Dates:May 23, 2020 , May 24, 2020 , May 25, 2020 , May 26, 2020 , May 27, 2020 , May 28, 2020
Frames: 125x600" (gain: 16.00) bin 1x1
Integration: 20.8 hours
Avg. Moon age: 3.16 days
Avg. Moon phase: 13.38%
Bortle Dark-Sky Scale: 3.00
Mean SQM: 21.71
Astrometry.net job: 3598176
RA center: 14h 5' 2"
DEC center: +53° 39' 20"
Pixel scale: 0.584 arcsec/pixel
Orientation: 81.097 degrees
Field radius: 0.208 degrees
Resolution: 2048x1538
Locations: ORCA Observatory, Near Matha, Charente-Maritime, France
Data source: Own remote observatory
Remote source: Non-commercial independent facility
This is NGC 5474. It is a dwarf galaxy satellite of M101. It's about 15 hours of integration (it's faint I need a bit more).
It's fascinating in that it's one of the few galaxies that look lopsided. The reason has long been assumed that it was the gravitational pull of M101 nearby that created it.
However, a paper published in Astronomy & Astrophysics in February this year ("The strange case of the peculiar spiral galaxy NGC 5474, New pieces of a galactic puzzle" by M. Bellazzini et al.) casts doubts on that explanation. There are several reasons:
- the galaxy has arms (even a faint bar), where recent star formation has occured (they're blue). These arms are centered on the bulge of the galaxy, therefore it might not be lopsided.
- there is a half circle of older stars SW of the bulge (left of the bulge in the image). That half circle is off-centre. M101 could have a responsibility in this, but it doesn't really explain it well. Another possible explanation is that the dwarf galaxy interacted with another dwarf galaxy a few Gyrs ago (goven the positions and velocities of M101 and NGC 5474, their interaction would be a few 100Myrs ago, so too late).
- it could even be that that region IS another dwarf galaxy. The bulge itself could be another dwarf galaxy. Data is currently insufficient to know.
Description: Darkened background (hate those uncalibrated LCD screens!), sharpened galaxy a bit. Hope it's not too cartoonish.
You have no new notifications. |
This page or operation is not available at the moment, because AstroBin is in READ ONLY mode. For more information, please check out our Twitter feed: https://twitter.com/AstroBin_com
This feature is only offered at higher membership levels.
Would you be interested in upgrading? AstroBin is a very small business and your support would mean a lot!
If this user has been harassing you, and you shadow-ban them, all their activities on your content will be invisible to everyone except themselves.
They will not know that they have been shadow-banned, and the goal is that eventually they will get bored while having caused no harm, since nobody saw what they posted.
You will remove your shadow-ban on this user, and their comments, messages, etc, will appear again on your content.
Such limitation improves the website as a whole by discouraging people from creating fake accounts to like their own content. Thank you for understanding!
Currently, your Image Index is .
To learn more about the Image Index, please visit the FAQ page. Thanks!
Comments