Cookie consent

AstroBin saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing AstroBin without changing the browser settings, you grant us permission to store that information on your device.

I agree
Contains:  M 35, NGC 2158, NGC 2168, The star 5Gem
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...

M35 and NGC2158 two brothers in the twins

Technical card

Imaging telescopes or lenses:Takahashi Epsilon 130D

Imaging cameras:Canon Eos77d

Mounts:Skywatcher AZ-EQ6

Guiding telescopes or lenses:Skywatcher 9x50 finder

Guiding cameras:Lacerta MGEN

Software:PhotoshopPleiades Astrophoto, S.L. Pix Insight


Dates:Dec. 24, 2017

Frames: 54x180" bin 0x0

Integration: 2.7 hours

Avg. Moon age: 5.60 days

Avg. Moon phase: 31.46%


Basic astrometry details

Astrometry.net job: 1871998

RA center: 6h 9' 9"

DEC center: +24° 20' 16"

Pixel scale: 2.689 arcsec/pixel

Orientation: 359.578 degrees

Field radius: 0.807 degrees


Resolution: 1729x1297

Locations: my lovely garden, near Vienna, Austria

Data source: Traveller

Description

On Dec 24th I got a special Xmas present, the sky went clear and I was able to try my new Eos77d. The cam has very little noise, bias approximately match the darks (but without hotpixels), and noise generally is low. Banding is much less than even with Eos6d. Canon finally has made a modern APS-C with tiny pixels, hooray!
The flats however were overcorrecting the lights, and I had to add an offset of 0.0234 to the BPP master flat to work normally (PixInsight processing). No idea yet what causes this, but the result... is pleasing.

Eos77d at Iso400, 54x3min subframes, Takahashi Epsilon 130D. AZ-EQ6 guided abd dithered by Lacerta MGEN.

Provided is a crop on the so unequal brothers, but you may like the full field too ;-)
Try the annotated version for object identification.

The little problem with flats is already solved. I am used to make flats at lowest Iso, but the Eos77d adds a different offset at Iso 100 and 200, compared to iso400, 800, 1600.
I took a series of flats at same light flux, 1/160 sec at Iso100, 1/320 at Iso200, 1/640 at Iso400, 1/1250 at Iso800 and 1/2500 at Iso1600. The flats should have approx the same absolute brightness, but they do not. Here the median values measued in PI/Statistics

Iso100 0.05451
Iso200 0.05441
Iso400 0.07817
Iso800 0.07938
Iso1600 0.07973

There are two groups of median brightnesses, Iso100 and 200, and Iso400, 800, 1600. My empirical found difference 0.0234 is pretty close. 8)

So, with Eos77d always make your flats at least in the same offset (Bias) category!

Comments

Author

tommy_nawratil
tommy_nawratil
License: None (All rights reserved)
104914
Like

Revisions

B

Description: annotated version

C

Description: crop on the brothers

Sky plot

Sky plot

Histogram

M35 and NGC2158 two brothers in the twins, 



    
        

            tommy_nawratil