Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Ursa Major (UMa)  ·  Contains:  M 101  ·  NGC 5447  ·  NGC 5449  ·  NGC 5450  ·  NGC 5451  ·  NGC 5453  ·  NGC 5455  ·  NGC 5457  ·  NGC 5461  ·  NGC 5462  ·  NGC 5471  ·  NGC 5477  ·  Pinwheel galaxy
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
M101 - in a spin, Tom Gray
Powered byPixInsight

M101 - in a spin

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
M101 - in a spin, Tom Gray
Powered byPixInsight

M101 - in a spin

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

M101 is a lovely face-on spiral, perfectly placed for imaging at the zenith. With a long clear night ahead, I was excited; the live stacked image looked great coming off the camera.

After that things went rapidly downhill - my flats failed to deal with the significant vignetting from my f3.3 focal reducer, resulting in unsightly artefacts and gradients. This image has taken me by far the longest to process.

Initially stacked in ASTAP, I could not get my filter stacks aligned, despite using astrometric solving, and half my frames were dropped due to quality. ASTAP also muddled up my data, backing up and replacing files.

I resorted to manual alignment and stacking the remaining frames in Nebulosity, expecting a straightforward workflow in Startools. Not so, this image is the result of the most convoluted workflow, I have ever undertaken, and has left my head in a spin!

Suffice it to say, this is a poor representation of M101. What is so frustrating is that the raw data appeared good. So, what have I learned? Don’t make assumptions, back up the raw data before processing, and work the problem. I will try again one cloudy night, but now I’m going to lie down!

Comments

Revisions

  • M101 - in a spin, Tom Gray
    Original
  • M101 - in a spin, Tom Gray
    B
  • Final
    M101 - in a spin, Tom Gray
    C

B

Description: WHAT a difference some proper pre-processing makes in ASTAP (thanks again @rich-sky). Exactly the same data taken from ASTAP, processed in Startools, using the defaults. A little removal of a few dust bunnies and artifacts from poor quality flats. Voila!

Given the relatively short 120s exposures and 118m integration (Lx24, Rx14, Gx8, Bx13) I'm pleased with the overall depth, detail and colour. I'll keep the other, just to remind me how aweful it was!

Uploaded: ...

C

Description: I've had another go trying to preserve the detail but reduce the noise (in the gradients from poor flats). The star spikes are just for fun, but represent the true star colours.

Uploaded: ...

Sky plot

Sky plot

Histogram

M101 - in a spin, Tom Gray