# 21 Oct, 2019 11:37
This is my first post here and I hope this theme has not already been dealt with (I could not find the Search Forum feature). I have a 6" F5 Newtonian and a Canon 800D DSLR (no mount yet but I'm looking for one). I'm in Europe.
I downloaded NINA recently and was very impressed by all the features. I wondered if APT was more effective and easy to use? What do you reckon? Thank you!
# 22 Oct, 2019 01:12
|Welcome! I've been using NINA for about a year now (coming from SGP) and am extremely pleased with not only the software but also how great the community has been over on their discord server for helping people get up and running, testing out new features, and just overall sharing tips and tricks. I can't speak for APT but certainly give it a try and see what works best for your taste. Looking forward to seeing your work!|
# 22 Oct, 2019 08:04
|Thank you Jonathan. I spent some time with NINA yesterday and it connects to my gear without problems so I will keep at it for the time being and see how it behaves under the stars.|
# 23 Oct, 2019 08:58
Developers of NINA recently did a presentation on TAIC
# 23 Oct, 2019 15:09
# 23 Oct, 2019 17:14
|Thanks a lot for the suggestion, it is a great project and initiative!|
# 03 Dec, 2019 20:58
well, both are great. I used APT up to just about three months when i switched to NINA.|
Both are easy but i like more the interface of NINA and the features including mosaics planing. Up to now no problems.
# 03 Dec, 2019 22:11
|I'm working through the same decision process. Yesterday I downloaded NINA and began reading the users guide. Today I'm working through APT. I am very impressed with both projects - absolutely amazing work. One thing that I didn't see in NINA is the ability to auto focus the camera. Is that just something I missed, or is that not supported yet?|
# 03 Dec, 2019 22:30
|Okay - I went back to the user guide another time and now I see the auto focuser setup in the user guide……silly me. I like the mosaics planning and I'm not committed to any interface yet, so I think I'm going to hang out with NINA for a bit and see how that goes.|
# 04 Dec, 2019 06:38
I have been using APT for years and I am quite happy with it. It has all the features I need.|
Some months ago I had a closer look at NINA, and I personally did not like the user interface. But that is a very personal thing.
I would recommend to try them both, and stick to the one that fits to your own workflow best.
# 04 Dec, 2019 19:00
I went ahead and paid for the full version of APT, so I plan to fully configure both and see which one works best for me. I haven't ruled out other options yet either.
I've been out of the hobby for over five years now. I'm amazed how things have evolved. I used to run Bob Denny's ACP for years, then ran John Smith's CCD Autopilot for a while. I ran my automated observatory remotely - even though it was in my backyard. I'm happy to see the number of options available today - and the lower barrier to entry for the new user that the current projects offer.
# 04 Dec, 2019 23:50
|I switched to NINA after months of using SGP, so I can’t comment on APT. I’ve been using NINA since April, and I love it. If you do decide to try it out, I would recommend you download the latest 1.10 nightly build, which includes some great additions to the auto-focus, parabolic and hyperbolic fitting, as well as some UI/UX improvements throughout. I know it’s a nightly dev build, but it is quite stable.|
# 05 Dec, 2019 00:38
Ara JerahianOut of curiosity, why did you make the switch from SGP to NINA? I am using NINA right now and have been tossing around the idea of spending the money on SGP.
# 05 Dec, 2019 02:50
I started with APT, then moved to N.I.N.A., and then switched over to Voyager which is what I use now.|
I liked N.I.N.A. a great deal, and certainly can't beat the price. I moved to Voyager (it's like SGP on steroids) simply because it has a few more features and more automated, but I thought N.I.N.A. was a great piece of software, especially for the price
# 05 Dec, 2019 19:02
Chris BarthelAra JerahianOut of curiosity, why did you make the switch from SGP to NINA? I am using NINA right now and have been tossing around the idea of spending the money on SGP.
Initially, it was because I was having issues blind solving with a local astrometry.net running on my machine. I could see the logs in ansvr reporting a successful plate-solve, but that success message would sometimes (not all the time) not make it back to SGP and it would time out. I spent a few weeks trying to figure it out and then just gave up. NINA was a bit younger then, but the ASTAP plate-solver the devs recommended for NINA has worked perfectly from day 1 until now, and it serves as a blind solver as well, so no need to install ansvr separately.
Also, the other things I immediately liked about NINA were the manual focus targets list, the built-in sky atlas, the object elevation chart for a sequence, the flats wizard. Some of these SGP also has and I had used, but I liked the way they worked in NINA better.
Don't get me wrong, SGP is a fantastic product which I have purchased and it has a large community of happy users. But, personally, I like the NINA UI/UX and its approach to automated sequencing better.
# 05 Dec, 2019 21:29
Ara JerahianThanks for that. Those are all features I like as well. I think I may just stick with NINA for the time being. I do definitely like the UI better in it. Also I guess the main things I would like to see NINA have are probably in the works.Chris BarthelChris-Ara JerahianOut of curiosity, why did you make the switch from SGP to NINA? I am using NINA right now and have been tossing around the idea of spending the money on SGP.
|You have no new notifications.|