Cookie consent

AstroBin saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing AstroBin without changing the browser settings, you grant us permission to store that information on your device.

I agree

Autoguiding Cam ASI178MC or 120MM-S

khrrugh
29 Jul, 2018 11:13
Hi fellow APs,

until now i used a ASI120MM-S (mono) as an autoguider and the ASI178MC (color) for imaging. Due to an update i will use a new 294MC Pro as imaging camera in the future. So now i have two cams available for autoguiding. Which one should i use? I am using a 8" RC (203/1624) with an OAG, see this image: OAG.

From the manufacturers website i know that the 178 (178 specs) is less noisy compared to the 120 (120 specs). But i believe the 120 to be more sensitive due to its monochrome sensor. Am i right or did i misunderstood the diagrams? Which decision should i make? Are there any obvious advantages / disadvantages i do not see?

Any advice appreciated, thanks and greetings,
Michael
Edited 29 Jul, 2018 11:19
GregGurdak
29 Jul, 2018 11:57
Hi, in my opinion avoid using  colour camera for guiding because stars looks bloated,  bigger about 20% than in mono camera on your PHD screen, especially when you’re shooting with long focal length telescope and  you need more precise guiding than short FL telescopes
Edited 29 Jul, 2018 11:57
khrrugh
02 Aug, 2018 11:23
Thank you, Greg. You made a point here for the ASI120. I will include your suggestion in my reflections.
Tele
27 Oct, 2018 03:53
120mm-c is a very good auto-guider. Transfers data very fast on a short usb3 cable, small pixels, mono, very sensitive, just load black frame for noise compensation.
khrrugh
27 Oct, 2018 09:58
Yes, i am using the 120MM-S mono and it works great. Thanks again, all!
 
Register or login to create to post a reply.