Cookie consent

AstroBin saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing AstroBin without changing the browser settings, you grant us permission to store that information on your device.

I agree

Qhy128c vs Atik 11000 or 16200

PascalB
26 Apr, 2018 18:29
0 likes
Hello i’ve got a celestron c8 edge hd and an altair 102/710
for the Time i’m using a NikonD810A
this camera is very nice to use but pixels are very small...
i’ m considering to buy a ccd camera with bigger size pixel
Atik 11000 with 9 nm pixel or Atik 16200 with 6nm pixel size
the  qhy 128 c is a CMOS with 6nmpixel seems nice also

i will enjoy your advice about that

anyway it will be color camera and not mono camera
because i ve to move to take picture each night

thanks
Like
FerginFay
17 Oct, 2019 13:18
0 likes
I have been trying to decide between Atik and QHY too. I will probably go with Atik because it is European and not Chinese.
Like
xordi
17 Oct, 2019 14:41
0 likes
The big pixels are really good to have in C8, but the corrected FoV is only size of APS-C so  you must crop a lot in fullframe sensors like in Atik 11000 or in Atik 16200. Atik 4000 fits better, however it is an older type.  I personally use AtikOne6 wit C8 and it is not that bad, but far from optimal. Binnig helps.
Edited 17 Oct, 2019 20:15
Like
koten90
18 Oct, 2019 05:15
0 likes
Personally I would choose a CCD instead of a CMOS. The QHY128C uses the same sensor used in Nikon D600-610-750. Do you really want another DSLR?
CCD works at 16bits (instead of 14).
Be careful also on the full well capacity. In CMOS you have a wonderful value in tech sheet, but raising the gain the FWC drops and you get everything burnt
go for 16200!!
Like
 
Register or login to create to post a reply.