The Image Index is a system based on likes received on images, that incentivizes the most active and liked members of the community. Learn more.
The Contribution Index (beta) is system to reward informative, constructive, and valuable commentary on AstroBin. Learn more.
Dates:June 30, 2020
Frames:
Chroma SII 3nm: 35x1200" -20C bin 1x1
Chroma Ha 3nm: 25x1200" -20C bin 1x1
Chroma OIII 3nm: 27x1200" -20C bin 1x1
Integration: 29.0 hours
Darks: ~18
Bias: ~50
Avg. Moon age: 9.72 days
Avg. Moon phase: 73.87%
Bortle Dark-Sky Scale: 7.00
Astrometry.net job: 3641218
RA center: 20h 48' 16"
DEC center: +30° 31' 55"
Pixel scale: 0.967 arcsec/pixel
Orientation: 85.878 degrees
Field radius: 1.119 degrees
Resolution: 5014x6658
Data source: Backyard
Western Veil Nebula, captured in June 2020
25 x 1200s Ha
27 x 1200s OIII
36 x 1200s SII
Total exposure: 29h20m.
Images captured with NINA
Calibrated and preprocessing in Pixinsight (deconvolution, local normalization)
Colorcombining + postprocessing in Photoshop, including selective color.
Chroma filters weren't cheap, and especially for Ha and SII, alternatives like Baader and ZWO are very comparable. The big difference however is in the OIII filter which produces absolutely no halo or bloating or reflections or anything of the kind: after colormapping, the bright Cygnus star was just this absolutely dazzling pure white, and 'the star' of the picture, rather than a disturbing source of artefacts. Each of those 3 filters was as expensive as my mount or my telescope (both in the 600 euro range, second hand), but I find it worth it.
The mount performed particularly well after I dissasembled it, cleaned it, replaced all bearings and grease, and put it back together and tuned it again (I call it the Beetsma-Tuning). It now runs reliably at 0.50'' - 0.60'', sometimes touching the low 0.40''s on clear nights and with a favourable position regarding counterweights. This is all well within the margins of the 2''/p image scale that the 5.4 mu pixels of the KAF8300 sensor in the Atik 383L+ gives: there's not a hint of star elongation in these subs, which greatly helps the sharpness.
I think this image also answers the question: is a doublet good for narrowband? I think it's superior to a triplet for narrowband: there is less glass to go through, less cooling down time, less chance on reflections, less impurities encountered. With 3nm narrowband - who cares that blue has a slightly different focal point compared to red? With HFR of 1.10 and lower in NINA - I think we're fine. The problem with doublets however is that they are often inferior to triples in terms of glass used and especially mechanical solidity. This old Stellarvue 102ED, which is at least 10 years old, however is very well built, and the feathertouch 2'' focuser, of course, is a joy to work with. Collimation of the scope was done by Ido Oosterveld from the Netherlands, and later finetuned by myself.
You have no new notifications. |
This page or operation is not available at the moment, because AstroBin is in READ ONLY mode. For more information, please check out our Twitter feed: https://twitter.com/AstroBin_com
This feature is only offered at higher membership levels.
Would you be interested in upgrading? AstroBin is a very small business and your support would mean a lot!
If this user has been harassing you, and you shadow-ban them, all their activities on your content will be invisible to everyone except themselves.
They will not know that they have been shadow-banned, and the goal is that eventually they will get bored while having caused no harm, since nobody saw what they posted.
You will remove your shadow-ban on this user, and their comments, messages, etc, will appear again on your content.
Please note: You are on a Free account, and when you delete an image, your upload counter does not decrease (unless the image is deleted within 24 hours of uploading it). The Free account is not a way to keep your most recent or best 10 images on AstroBin, but a trial period for you to decide whether or not a paid subscription is worth it. For more information, please click here.
The image will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. All its revisions will be deleted too. Are you sure?
You will delete all other revisions (if any), and the originally uploaded image, leaving the current revision as the final and only version of this image.
You will delete all revisions, leaving the originally uploaded image as the final and only version of this image.
Such limitation improves the website as a whole by discouraging people from creating fake accounts to like their own content. Thank you for understanding!
Currently, your Image Index is .
To learn more about the Image Index, please visit the FAQ page. Thanks!
Comments