Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Lacerta (Lac)  ·  Contains:  HD213191  ·  HD213391  ·  HD213421  ·  HD213472  ·  HD213659  ·  HD213835  ·  HD213976  ·  HD214022  ·  HD214040  ·  HD214243  ·  HD214283  ·  HD214524  ·  LBN 437  ·  LBN 442  ·  NGC 7282
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
LBN 437 / Sh2-136, Gary Imm
Powered byPixInsight

LBN 437 / Sh2-136

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
LBN 437 / Sh2-136, Gary Imm
Powered byPixInsight

LBN 437 / Sh2-136

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

This is one of my favorite deep sky objects, nicknamed the Gecko Nebula.  It is a molecular cloud located about 2000 light years away in the constellation of Lacerta at a declination of +41 degrees.  The cloud is about 1.3 degrees long, which corresponds to a length of about 45 light years.

The cloud is located in a region of the sky that has a tremendous number of distant background Milky Way stars, as well as several bright foreground blue and yellow stars. The red Ha emission seen throughout the image is part of Sh2-126. The emission nebula is excited by the bright star 10 Lac, which is off image to the lower left.

At the head of the Gecko is a tiny intricate white reflection nebula, seen best in the full resolution view. The YSO (Young Star Object) at the center of this reflection nebula is Herbig Ae/Be V375 Lacertae. Numerous Herbig--Haro objects have been identified in the same region as the reflection nebula, including HH 398, the white wisp at the above mentioned star.  YSOs are amazing objects - my Astrobin YSO Collection is here.

Another interesting aspect of the head is the BRC, or Bright Rimmed Cloud. A BRC is the remnant of a molecular cloud which has been photoionized by a massive star. The bottom edge of the head of the Gecko is a BRC, as seen by the Ha emission front. BRCs containing these Ha fronts have been found to be strong candidates for star formation.

I was pretty happy at the time with my image of this object taken in 2019 with my Tak 85 (with 4x the integration time), but in comparison, that image seems . . . well, a bit lacking.

Comments