Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Ursa Major (UMa)  ·  Contains:  NGC 3938
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
NGC 3938 (LRGB), rhedden
NGC 3938 (LRGB)
Powered byPixInsight

NGC 3938 (LRGB)

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
NGC 3938 (LRGB), rhedden
NGC 3938 (LRGB)
Powered byPixInsight

NGC 3938 (LRGB)

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

NGC 3938 is an 11th magnitude SA(s)c spiral galaxy in Ursa Major, measuring 5.4' x 4.9'. Discovered in 1785, it is on the original Herschel 400 list. Distance estimates range from 43 million to 58 million light years. (Source: Rick Johnson, Mantrapskies.com).

This image is an LRGB image taken from my Bortle 4/5 backyard, with RGB data from 2020 and L data from 2021. I took very long, oversampled RGB subs (18 minutes) to see if I could get a little bit better resolution on the H-alpha regions. The answer is "no." The seeing was below average when I took the luminance subs, but there is not much I can do when I get so few clear nights in the late winter. About 2/3 of the luminance subs were taken with the 35% illuminated moon on the other side of the sky, so I have marked Bortle 5 in the acquisition details.

Processing notes: I usually don't crop my galaxy images much, but there is an obnoxiously bright star just outside the field of view, which I found distracting. It reminds me of my inconsiderate neighbor's motion-activated spotlight. I'm trying to image a galaxy, and here's this bright distraction shining on my gear. Let's crop out the bright star (and the neighbor).



Modest noise reduction was applied using Noiseware, and a bit of smoothing of the background in Images Plus. Since I was combining data with two different camera rotations, I ran into all kinds of strange problems with fixed pattern noise when I attempted to add the RGB subs to a synthetic luminance stack. I abandoned that approach and just used pure luminance subs in the end. Remind me to never take data on a project in two different years. New flats, different rotation, different seeing conditions, etc. conspire to make processing much more difficult.

Comments