Cookie consent

AstroBin saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing AstroBin without changing the browser settings, you grant us permission to store that information on your device.

I agree
Contains: 

Jupiter: 2019-06-15 (UT 18:05 2019-06-14)

Acquisition type: Lucky imaging

Technical card

Resolution: 577x529

Date:June 15, 2019

Time: 02:05

Frames: 19440

FPS: 80.00000

Focal length: 5600

CMI: 150.30

CMII: 281.20

CMIII: 252.60

Seeing: 3

Transparency: 8

Locations: Home, Singapore, Singapore

Data source: Backyard

Description

The night this data was collected had pretty good transparency and reasonable seeing, but I was a bit concerned about the data quality nonetheless ... for some reason, I always struggle with the stability of my CEM60 when the OTA is on the east side of the mount. My imaging targets bounce around a lot, almost like the mount is being affected by wind (but with no wind or breeze to speak of). Maybe I need to adjust the counterweights/balance for this circumstance? Any tips/ideas on this one appreciated!

In the end I had 18 x 90s captures with decent data to stack and de-rotate - total time elapsed between the first and last capture is almost exactly 30mins. Between the vibration in the mount and the seeing I had to be pretty brutal with the frame quality selection, stacking the top 15% in each case. Thus the final images contain just shy of 20,000 frames of data.

I went back-and-forth with the processing on this one, initially producing an image that looked nice and crisp - sharpening taken just far enough to remove the blur, but possibly over-sharpened for some tastes (Rev B).

But I then decided that "some tastes" included my own, so I made a version with the sharpening backed off a little (Rev A).

Arguably a quite subtle difference, but let me know which you prefer. :)

Finally, I have produced an animation by de-rotating a moving average of 6 captures/stacks (Rev C).

Thanks for looking!

Comments

Author

DMach
Darren (DMach)
License: None (All rights reserved)
8357
Like

Revisions

B

Sharper version.

C

Animation

Histogram

Jupiter: 2019-06-15 (UT 18:05 2019-06-14), 





    
        

            Darren (DMach)