Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Cygnus (Cyg)  ·  Contains:  HD191139  ·  HD191201  ·  HD191226  ·  HD191456  ·  HD191493  ·  HD191494  ·  HD191611  ·  HD191612  ·  HD191765  ·  HD191783  ·  HD191917  ·  HD192103  ·  HD192283  ·  HD192445  ·  HD227709  ·  HD227710  ·  HD227721  ·  HD227732  ·  HD227742  ·  HD227743  ·  HD227776  ·  HD227795  ·  HD227806  ·  HD227820  ·  HD227821  ·  HD227826  ·  HD227828  ·  HD227836  ·  HD227837  ·  HD227875  ·  And 68 more.
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
WR134, Dan Kusz
Powered byPixInsight

WR134

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
WR134, Dan Kusz
Powered byPixInsight

WR134

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

WR 134 is a variable Wolf-Rayet star located around 6,000 light years away from Earth in the constellation of Cygnus, surrounded by a faint bubble nebula blown by the intense radiation and fast wind from the star. It is five times the radius of the sun, but due to a temperature over 63,000 K it is 400,000 times as luminous as the Sun.

 Intense radiation and stellar winds have created a bubble of gas around the star. In this image the bubble is seen in blue doubly ionized oxygen  light. When i was imaging the OIII data I noticed when i did a very aggressive stretch on a single frame that there is a lot more OIII signal in the area. Once I saw this and that is actually might have some texture to it, I decided to integrate many more frames into the stack. Finishing at 100x10' frames I was able to pull out a significant OIII signal from the stacked image. As you can see the OIII signal extends well beyond the main OIII emissions. The faint OIII has some texture, ridges, and wispy elements that add a lot to the image. I am glad I was able to see the faint OIII and subsequently capture many more frames to bring it out in its fullest.

I went a little less aggressive with this image in regards to star reduction. I typically drop the stars down significantly to bring more focus to the nebulosity, but this time I left them more pronounced. Which do you prefer, heavy or light star de-emphasis?

Thanks for looking
CS
Dan.

Comments

Sky plot

Sky plot

Histogram

WR134, Dan Kusz