Which long focal lengths make sense for the average astro photographer? Generic equipment discussions · Christian Großmann · ... · 76 · 2379 · 21

Erlend_Langsrud 0.90
...
·  1 like
If narrow field is the priority, I would suggest moving to an f/5 Newt.

Why? Only because f/5 is far more forgiving.

1. Much easier to collimate.

+

2. Can get away with a less than perfect coma corrector.

= You get closer to the theoretical resolution of the system.
Like
cgrobi 4.53
...
Erlend Langsrud:
If narrow field is the priority, I would suggest moving to an f/5 Newt.

Why? Only because f/5 is far more forgiving.

1. Much easier to collimate.

+

2. Can get away with a less than perfect coma corrector.

= You get closer to the theoretical resolution of the system.

@Erlend Langsrud

That's exectly what I try next. I have 10" f/5 Newton that I didn't use. For several reasons, I thought the mount was to weak to handle that weapon. But now, I am working on it to make it usable again and to fit my needs. When I look at its images I took a while ago with the knowledge I have today, I think the problems I saw were not related to the mount. Today, I am quite sure, that I can handle it. This way, I increase the focal length to 1270mm times 1,06 with the coma corrector. I did as i mentioned before and bought a new camera (for several reasons the ASI 294MM Pro) with larger pixels than the 183mm. So it is not the perfect match, but it's better than before.

CS

Christian
Like
 
Register or login to create to post a reply.