8.51
...
·
|
---|
Have you done anything to it, such as drizzle 2x? What parameters for SN++ and what SN++? |
1.51
...
·
|
---|
Andrea... Thanks for the question. It is not Starnet++ that is creating the problem. I went back and looked at the R, G and B masters and the problem is there. George |
8.51
...
·
|
---|
George Hatfield: The seems more in tune with my experience with SN++. Glad you found the source of the issue. |
9.44
...
·
|
---|
George, That's bad rejection. I actually experienced this the other day when stacking data between 2 and 3 scopes. We saw that sort of artifacting present when we used Winsorized rejection. Once we switched to ESD (Extreme Studentized Deviate), all of our issues went away. Give it a shot. -Brian |
1.51
...
·
·
1
like
|
---|
Brian... thanks for the idea. I tried it (ESD) and got the same result. I think the problem is that many of the green subs have very poor eccentricity (>0.8) and this makes stacking by any method difficult. The red and blue are OK. What is the saying about making a "silk purse?" Time to move on to the next data set. George |
9.44
...
·
|
---|
George Hatfield: Makes sense. That's a bummer. You could TRY batch processing the data set with BlurX, use an ImageContainer and run all the individual subs through it. I've only tried this once, but maybe. Just a thought, but I'd understand if you moved on. |
1.51
...
·
|
---|
I tried running BlurX on one of the poorer green subs. The result was smaller elongated stars. Not much help. I reduced the final image in half (resampled), and the star problems are hard to see so that is what I will use. Here is the hopefully, final image: https://www.astrobin.com/urcg7u/ George |