Good idea to start this collection since there are so few objects and not many people imaging them. Together we have 8 out of the first 11.
I took a look at my Abell 85 and it misses the We 2-262.
I think your instruction on the Tag should be W=XYY?
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
|
Thanks, Jerry, yes you are correct - I have now corrected it
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
|
I hope to have something, can we capture that with smaller scopes and under light pollution skies like Bortle 8/9?
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Tareq Abdulla:
I hope to have something, can we capture that with smaller scopes and under light pollution skies like Bortle 8/9?
Responded to your other post also.
I am in Bortle 7... Gary is in Bortle 4.
Other thing you can do is concentrate on targets with higher elevations. I am trying to do some small galaxies in LRGB but only above 60 Degrees elevation. Example:
NGC 7640
I am very frustrated recently because in addition to my light pollution I have been having more humidity/fog south of San Francisco than usual. That is really a killer. Thus I cannot get the amount of exposure on these targets that they deserve. I have to throw out 2/3 of my subs most recently.... I really should move my observatory to the mountains but a bit too old for that.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Jerry Yesavage:
Tareq Abdulla:
I hope to have something, can we capture that with smaller scopes and under light pollution skies like Bortle 8/9?
Responded to your other post also.
I am in Bortle 7... Gary is in Bortle 4.
Other thing you can do is concentrate on targets with higher elevations. I am trying to do some small galaxies in LRGB but only above 60 Degrees elevation. Example:
NGC 7640
I am very frustrated recently because in addition to my light pollution I have been having more humidity/fog south of San Francisco than usual. That is really a killer. Thus I cannot get the amount of exposure on these targets that they deserve. I have to throw out 2/3 of my subs most recently.... I really should move my observatory to the mountains but a bit too old for that.
I hope when i return back to imaging or astrophotography then i see how bad is my sky now, and i definitely will image for long time integration time, 2 hours is never enough for anything even easy nebulae, i mean i know i have to go with more and more time, even for RGB, so i will see what i can do, and your Bortle 7 is still better than others Bortle 8 or 9 anyway, but i won't give up, i will try first from my bedroom window which is facing North which is also the most light polluted with LED street lights, if i passed this challenge nicely then all sky is possible for me.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
9.03
2.94
