Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Andromeda (And)  ·  Contains:  Andromeda Galaxy  ·  M 110  ·  M 31  ·  M 32  ·  NGC 205  ·  NGC 206  ·  NGC 221  ·  NGC 224
M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal, Wouter Cazaux
Powered byPixInsight

M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal

M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal, Wouter Cazaux
Powered byPixInsight

M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

20211008 - M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal

What’s in the picture(s)
M31 - The Andromeda Galaxy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andromeda_Galaxy

Quote: “The Andromeda Galaxy, also known as Messier 31, M31, or NGC 224 and originally the Andromeda Nebula, is a barred spiral galaxy approximately 2.5 million light-years from Earth and the nearest major galaxy to the Milky Way.

The virial mass of the Andromeda Galaxy is of the same order of magnitude as that of the Milky Way, at 1 trillionsolar masses.
The Andromeda Galaxy has a diameter of about 220,000 ly, making it the largest member of the Local Group in terms of extension.
The number of stars contained in the Andromeda Galaxy is estimated at one trillion, or roughly twice the number estimated for the Milky Way.

The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are expected to collide in around 4-5 billion years, merging to form a giant elliptical Galaxy.”

😳 … No worries, we won’t feel a thing … 😉

What was the experience
This is the same scope, same FoV as my previous image, NGC 6946 Fireworks Galaxy, but the difference in size and close-up is staggering. With 3 hours of colour data at f6.5, I still only have a soft hue of M31, but I did want to saturate the stars to give the great dame in the sky a little sparkle.

How it was done
Scope: TS-140 APO (FL 910mm / with x1.0 flattener)
Mount: CEM70G
Camera: ASI2600MM Pro
Guiding: @zwoasi OAG, ASI174MM, ASIAIR Pro
Filter: ZWO EFW - RGB/SHO  Baader
Resolution: 0,85”/pixel, FoV 107’
Moon: 6%(+), Bortle 5/6 SQM 19.60
Photons:  Gain 100 -10c 300s LRGB 10x 12x 12x 12x
Processing: PixInsight (Mac)
Astrobin: 

What have I learned from this
I continue to try-out the TS140 and LRGB imaging/processing, to gain more experience in enhancing and combining separate channels to come to a “full” image, albeit that “full” starts having different meanings, highly dependant on the processing. I processed this mainly as a combined image, but a next revision will be touching on the separate channels, separating out the stars as well. As I gain more experience, I notice more and more the imperfections in the image ….
As I said before, there isn’t a ‘single’ outcome of look and feel, it’s just the road you take that is important, the path of continuous learning and improving …
Happy with what I am learning …. 🤩

Clear Skies everybody! 🤩✨🔭

Follow me @astrowaut
Astrobin: https://www.astrobin.com/users/WCA65/

Comments

Revisions

  • M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal, Wouter Cazaux
    Original
  • M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal, Wouter Cazaux
    B
  • Final
    M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal, Wouter Cazaux
    C

B

Description: 20211021 - Complete reprocessing to try and remove a subtle background gradient that was still in the original image. Toned down the saturation of the stars, boosted more of the rgb in the outer edges of the galaxy.

Image quality issues I’m still stuck with: Although this is 3 hours of rgb data, there’s hardly any colour in the galaxy. Trying to over-boost this through the saturation, would give a pinkish hue to the galaxy (not done in this revision), which would mean there’s an imbalance between blue/red and green, which I don’t yet know where it came from or how to correct. Apparently the core has gotten a little donut through the HDR and boosting the rgb. Although I much more prefer a small core, there seems to be a general tendency amongst astrophotographers to make the core more prominent. Not sure which is better

Uploaded: ...

C

Description: I wasn’t fully satisfied with my previous version of M31. It lacked a lot of colour, in spite of having 3 hours of rgb, which I had tried to compensate by oversaturating the image, causing all kinds of side-effects: a subtle gradient in the background, neon-like stars with halos 😵‍💫 and a flat coloured M31 with a pinkish hue that wasn’t at all what it supposed to be. I was happy with the detail of the image, but it looked more like a luminance image, It couldn’t be that the data was all that bad … something must’ve gone missing 🤔

Checking out some workflow tutorials, I came to realise something was wrong in the way I processed my lrgb. I reprocessed my image of M31 from September 8th, 2021 (lrgb with my TS140/ASI2600MM), and managed to come to a better, more decent result: flat starfield (at least to my eyes), a nice golden colour of M31 and stars that didn’t look like they jumped out of an Andy Warhol painting … and a core … well, that’s debatable. I like a smaller core with more detail in the dark gas clouds around it 🤨

Before posting my new/old M31, I first tested the new found skills and logic, by also re-processing some of my previous images: Iris Nebula, Fireworks Galaxy, M33, etc … and came to similar improvements, which I already posted.

Weary of the wrath of astrophotographers abound on how the perfect M31 should look, I’ve tried to do the data a bit more justice and I’m releasing this image into the “public” again … 👍

Uploaded: ...

Sky plot

Sky plot

Histogram

M31 AND Andromeda Galaxy - Up close and personal, Wouter Cazaux