Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Ursa Major (UMa)  ·  Contains:  86 UMa  ·  M 101  ·  NGC 5368  ·  NGC 5422  ·  NGC 5447  ·  NGC 5449  ·  NGC 5450  ·  NGC 5451  ·  NGC 5453  ·  NGC 5455  ·  NGC 5457  ·  NGC 5461  ·  NGC 5462  ·  NGC 5471  ·  NGC 5473  ·  NGC 5474  ·  NGC 5477  ·  NGC 5484  ·  NGC 5485  ·  NGC 5486  ·  PGC 140265  ·  PGC 214207  ·  PGC 214224  ·  PGC 2437820  ·  PGC 2438156  ·  PGC 2438310  ·  PGC 2439022  ·  PGC 2439086  ·  PGC 2439146  ·  PGC 2439423  ·  And 235 more.
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield, Paul Macklin
Powered byPixInsight

Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield, Paul Macklin
Powered byPixInsight

Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

I think I've got my new William Optics Fluorostar 91 just about dialed in! I tested widefield in nearly full moon conditions, so please excuse the poor quality. 

I'm using the W.O. 0.8x flattener, a ZWO OAG, ZWO filter drawer, and a new asi2600mc-pro. Setting the WO reducer at 5.6mm is a good start, but it doesn't account for the thickness of the filter. At that setting, I had some star elongation in the corners and some evidence of tilt. 

Adjusting the flattener to 6.0mm fixed the corners, and the modest tilt was also corrected. My OAG stalk is still causing slight shadow that can *mostly* be resolved with flats, but you can still see some artifacts from that here. Next time I'll pull it up even a little bit more. 

Still this is all looking good for my widefield upgrade from the ZenithStar 61ii. More aperture, greater pixel resolution (from 2.15"/px at f/5.9 to 1.8"/px at f/4.72), without sacrificing FOV due to the larger sensor on the new asi2600mc-pro (upgrading from an asi533mc-pro). Now I just need to transfer my EAF from the ZS to the FLT.  I think we have a winner! 

The full setup is about 17 pounds. OAG-based guiding (with just the zwo OAG and a wee asi120mm-mini) has been under 0.8" RMS on both axes--well below my pixel scale. This is in spite of very poor balancing since I only had a 10 pound counterweight and don't have started z-axis balancing yet. So, this scope is indeed quite viable on a cem26.

Prior widefield setup: ZenithStar 61 + asi533mc pro
* aperture: 61mm
* optics: doublet APO FPL-53
* FOV: 1 deg 48' x 1 deg 48' 
* resolution: 2.15"/px at f/5.9

New widefield setup: FluoroStar 91 + asi2600mc pro 
* aperture: 91mmm
* optics: triplet APO FPL-53
* FOV: 3 deg 7' x 2 deg 5' 
* resolution" 1.79"/px at f/4.7

Better and faster optics, wider FOV, and finer resolution. That's a win!

Comments

Revisions

  • Final
    Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield, Paul Macklin
    Original
  • Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield, Paul Macklin
    B
  • Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield, Paul Macklin
    C
  • Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield, Paul Macklin
    D

B

Title: Zoom on NGC5474

Description: Zoom in on NGC5474 -- a top-down spiral galaxy.

Uploaded: ...

C

Title: Zoom on NGC5422

Description: Zoom on NGC5422, an edge-on spiral galaxy.

Uploaded: ...

D

Title: asi533mc simulated crop

Description: Here's a crop to the approximate FOV of an asi533mc pro for comparison.

Uploaded: ...

Sky plot

Sky plot

Histogram

Testing the Fluorostar 91 in Messier 101 widefield, Paul Macklin