Powered byPixInsight
AstroBin saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing AstroBin without changing the browser settings, you grant us permission to store that information on your device.
I agreeImaging telescopes or lenses: Canon 200 mm f/2.8 L II USM
Imaging cameras: ZWO ASI1600MM-Cool
Mounts: Orion Atlas EQ-G
Guiding telescopes or lenses: Orion 50mm Guide Scope with helical focusing
Guiding cameras: QHYCCD 5L-II M
Software: Photoshop CS6 · PHD2 Guiding · Main Sequence Software Sequence Generator Pro · Pixinsight 1.8 · Cartes du Ciel
Filters: Astrodon Tru-Balance 1.25" 5nm Ha · Astrodon Tru-Balance 1.25" 3nm OIII
Accessory: Shoestring Astronomy EQDIR
Dates:Aug. 16, 2017 , Aug. 18, 2017 , Aug. 24, 2017 , Aug. 27, 2017
Frames:
Astrodon Tru-Balance 1.25" 3nm OIII: 40x600" (gain: 200.00) -15C bin 1x1
Astrodon Tru-Balance 1.25" 5nm Ha: 35x300" (gain: 139.00) -15C bin 1x1
Integration: 9.6 hours
Darks: ~50
Flats: ~40
Bias: ~100
Avg. Moon age: 14.55 days
Avg. Moon phase: 22.34%
Bortle Dark-Sky Scale: 2.20
Mean SQM: 20.79
Astrometry.net job: 2105631
RA center: 21h 10' 38"
DEC center: +60° 5' 40"
Pixel scale: 2.700 arcsec/pixel
Orientation: -10.295 degrees
Field radius: 2.675 degrees
Resolution: 5500x4542
Data source: Traveller
The most fun and the most frustrating astro-image I've made so far! This is my fourth attempt at narrowband imaging. My first 3 subjects were: Jellyfish, N. America, and Crescent. This one was a LOT harder! Many false starts and missteps both in acquisition and processing. I threw out HOURS of data that wasn’t up to par, and this is my 4th full revision of the processing. I am still not fully happy with it, but each revision had positives and negatives, and I think this is the best balance of those so far. The most fun thing about the making of this image was the data (that I kept) was all captured on my road trip to see the eclipse, so all the data was from fairly dark to very dark sites. It is **very** faint. I used a tone mapping process originally described by J-P Metsavainio, which is why the stars are completely white. Basically all the color data is in the tone maps (which are starless). I then recombined that with the a synthetic Lum made out of Ha and Oiii data combined to bring back in the detail and stars.
Description: Slight changes to colors that I think I like better.
Description: More color tweaks... better? I think I've realized I am never going to get it looking exactly how I want without RGB data- I might try to gather some later this summer.
| Camera Lens Astrophotography |
| Northeast Imagers |
| ZWO ASI1600MM/QHY163M |
| Beginners AP |
Comments