Celestial hemisphere:  Southern  ·  Constellation: Monoceros (Mon)  ·  Contains:  LBN 990  ·  LBN 993  ·  LBN 994  ·  LBN 995  ·  LBN 996  ·  LBN 997  ·  LBN 998  ·  LBN 999  ·  LDN 1644  ·  LDN 1645  ·  LDN 1646  ·  NGC 2170  ·  NGC 2182  ·  NGC 2183  ·  NGC 2185  ·  VdB68  ·  VdB69  ·  VdB70  ·  VdB73
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
NGC2170 from B9+, John Favalessa
Powered byPixInsight

NGC2170 from B9+

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
NGC2170 from B9+, John Favalessa
Powered byPixInsight

NGC2170 from B9+

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

I pushed my backyard imaging too far this time 😂 ...as this nebula is to the south towards San Fernando valley (“valley girls”) and downtown LA (33 miles away).  SQM in this direction is 16.90 to 17.05 😩 which is Bortle 9++   It is amazing that I got anything at all.  I stretched the hell out of this angel but was unable to pull out any of the wonderful dust that abounds. My framing was to include the moon with clouds object LBN990.  This was also a test of the new Antlia Quad light pollution filter.  I started imaging this target in December with the Antlia Triband RGB filter but the result was terrible.  The Quad is definitely a better light pollution filter for us on the edge.  With all the clouds this winter I was lucky to get the 13 hours.  Seems I was at the diminishing returns point also.  I'm giving myself an “A” for effort!

For a truly top quality image and description of this target(s) please visit @Timothy Martin's  fine image (soon to be IOTD 😀) https://www.astrobin.com/v7lneh/

Long story why I wanted to go after this angelic beauty…for a dear friend who had several what she called appearances of angels in her life.  She was in poor health so I had a bit of urgency…sadly she died recently before I could complete.

Oh, about the vertical lines...I'm clueless, but think it might be stationary satellites?  They are very faint but present in all subs across almost a full month in exactly same position.   -john

Comments