Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Serpens (Ser)  ·  Contains:  M 5  ·  NGC 5904  ·  The star 5 Ser
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm), tjm8874
M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm), tjm8874
M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm)
Powered byPixInsight

M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm)

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm), tjm8874
M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm), tjm8874
M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm)
Powered byPixInsight

M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm)

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

Version A : Askar 130PHQ, ASI6200MM on AM5
Version B : Askar 80PHQx0.76, ASI2600MM on HAE43
Filter : both Antlia V-Pro LRGB
Imaging : gain100, -10C, 180sec, Lx15 Rx7 Gx7 Bx7
Process : APP, ABE, Crop, BXT, NXT, SPCC, MS, LRGB, CT, CT, CameraRaw
(Ver.B was integrated 2x Drizzle then StarAlignment to Ver.A)

I wanted to compare 80PHQ and 130PHQ (both really I love) at same time, same guiding accuracy.
130PHQ shows clearly better resolution at surrounding very small stars.

Ver.A Result L FWHM=3.28px(2.54arcsec)
Ver.B Result L FWHM=4.9px(3.8arcsec)

Comments

Revisions

  • Final
    M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm), tjm8874
    Original
  • M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm), tjm8874
    B

B

Title: 80PHQ

Description: Same target taken by 80PHQx0.76

Uploaded: ...

Sky plot

Sky plot

Histogram

M5 compared 130PHQ(1000mm) vs 80PHQ(455mm), tjm8874