Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
NGC2403 in H alpha-- comparison between 6m and 0.4m telescopes, film vs CCD, erdmanpe

NGC2403 in H alpha-- comparison between 6m and 0.4m telescopes, film vs CCD

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
NGC2403 in H alpha-- comparison between 6m and 0.4m telescopes, film vs CCD, erdmanpe

NGC2403 in H alpha-- comparison between 6m and 0.4m telescopes, film vs CCD

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

Some decades back, when I began teaching astronomy classes, I often pointed out the huge advancements in detector technology taking place that would revolutionize astronomy.  With CCD detectors becoming affordable, amateurs could now perform measurements with modest sized telescopes that could only be performed by the giant telescopes of the previous day using film.  The improvement in detector quantum efficiency changed everything.

Just for fun I put together this side by side comparison of H alpha images.  One from my driveway with a Meade SC 400mm f/10 equipped with a CCD detector, and the other taken with the 6m telescope in Zelentchuk at ~2000m altitude, using Kodak 103 aE film (Astron. Astrophys. 237, 23-35 (1990)).  An f/1 focal reducer was used on the 6m so the plate scale was not terribly different.  The bandwidths of the Ha filters used were similar (~3nm), as was the total integration time (~3.5 hours).  I just did a screen clip from the published paper to obtain the image with the 6m, and adjusted display settings for my image with a log stretch to try and match the 6m image as best I could for comparison purposes.  Seeing for the 6m image was stated to be about 1 arcsec, mine wasn't so good here at the bottom of the atmosphere. The defects in the film plate make the 6m image obvious, but to my eye each reaches about as deep.

Amazing progress.

Comments

Histogram

NGC2403 in H alpha-- comparison between 6m and 0.4m telescopes, film vs CCD, erdmanpe